Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jeannie Mackenzie's avatar

Thank you for this. I have a similar experience. While I am content to accept that agents and publishers rejected or ignored my offering because they believed my book to be unmarketable for other reasons, I do have the slightest suspicion that it did not meet the LGBTQ+ demands. The novel is written in first person by a white, heterosexual 15 year old Scottish boy, navigating his difficulties with dysfunctional parents and struggling to get a girlfriend. His best friend is gay, not because I needed a token gay, but just because that’s what he told me himself when he leapt out of the pages.

Reader have expressed amazement that I, an elderly woman, could write so compellingly in the voice of a teen boy, but most of my working life has been with teen lads - I know their landscape.

Teens who have read my book said they enjoyed how real it was to their experiences and said they strongly identified with the characters. But very few teens will read it cos it’s self published, and doesn’t have a ‘minority’ voice.

I read around 20 YA novels, including prize winning ones, in preparation for writing this one. Almost none of them addressed the pressure everyday adolescents experience.

Anyway, my very best wishes with your novel. Mine can be found at most online outlets, but probably not in a bookshop!

‘ Adults and How to Survive Them’ Jeannie Mackenzie May 2024 https://www.waterstones.com/book/adults-and-how-to-survive-them/jeannie-mackenzie/9781738558902

Expand full comment
Sarah Gellner's avatar

As a fellow writer I have the same concerns - though given that rejection is a staple of the process, in practice it's virtually impossible to prove it's ideological . . .. but a reputable older agent has warned me informally that mainstream publishing is basically staffed and gate-kept by exactly the kind of posh young arts-grad females who are all-in for this kind of Social Justice, LGBTQIA+ activism.

I can't believe it's not having a massive impact on the quality of published output; anyone who thinks they need a Sensitivity Reader in my view for example is simply admitting they haven't done sufficient research. But authors may not have a choice.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts